How do I convert PDF files? File Viewer Plus — Get it from Microsoft. Adobe Acrobat Reader DC. Foxit Reader. Corel WordPerfect Icecream PDF Converter. Wondershare PDFelement. Smile PDFpenPro. Solid PDF to Word. Microsoft OneDrive. Sedja PDF Editor. Adobe Acrobat Reader. Infraware Polaris Office. MobiSystems OfficeSuite Pro. File Viewer for Android. Google Play Books. Google Drive. Verified by FileInfo. National Research Foundation NRF : Step 1: Applicants who submit applications by the internal closing deadline are guaranteed an internal review.
Step 2: Internal review is undertaken by the Research Office. Step 3: Feedback is provided to applicants and, if necessary, applications reopened for amendment. Step 4: Applicants resubmit applications before the NRF final deadline. The administrator will obtain institutional approval from the Deputy Dean for Research and forward this to the funder. The application then gets sent to an internal administrator in the Faculty of Health Sciences who takes the application to the Deputy Dean for Research for institutional approval.
Once the signed application is received, the administrator uploads this and completes the online submission to the funder. Two standing subcommittees of the IRC will be responsible for the scientific review of protocols requiring human or animal ethics clearance. The two standing subcommittees of the IRC namely the Human Research Scientific Review and the Animal Research Scientific Review subcommittees will be responsible for establishing an explicit and formal scientific review process that evaluates the scientific merit and potential risks of each protocol before the protocol is submitted to Faculty's Human or Animal Research Ethics Committees.
Andruween in turn will log the application with a tracking number. Hardcopies will be requested only once the relevant IRC subcommittee has approved the application. For protocols requiring human scientific reviews , the following materials are to be submitted:. If your protocol is a sub-study of an existing study, please include a brief description of the parent study, the current status of the parent study, and how the sub-study will fit with the parent study.
Andruween will forward the proposal electronically to the subcommittee Chair who in turn assigns the proposal to a member of the subcommittee as primary reviewer. The secondary reviewer will be assigned by the subcommittee member and will be drawn from the names of potential reviewers as per applicant's recommendation. Protocols to be reviewed within one week. Comments of primary and secondary reviewers will be sent to all members of the relevant subcommittee. Each subcommittee will meet and consider all reviews.
Hardcopies of approved proposals will be requested and signed on the same day. Approval of resubmissions is however at the discretion of the subcommittee Chairs and outstanding or major issues may be held over to the next subcommittee meeting. Due Dates for submission of applications for Scientific and Ethics reviews are listed here. The IRC Committees will not normally review Grant applications unless a complete protocol is submitted for review.
Protocols that are the result of successful grant awards following the C1 process, and that have already undergone scientific review , will only be re-reviewed by the IRC if substantive changes to the study design have taken place. Mechanisms are in place to deal with urgent applications.
0コメント